Lord of the Rings

[tigerstyle18]

Well I was already halfway through the fellowship of the ring before I was told that I should read the hobbit first. I didn't think it would matter since the hobbit was written after LOTR I believe. Oh well, I already went too far the quitnit now and start with the hobbit.

 

 

[ZeRo]

i wouldnt say the hobbit was vital to read before. it jst gets the background of how he finds the ring. but its a very good book. i love LOTR to and harry potter. does anyone kno when the new book is comeing out? what did people prefer the films of LOTR or harry potter? i prefered LOTR but both worth seeing.

[jdash]

ummm...correct me if I am wrong but no, the hobbit was written long before LOTR was finished.

 

James

 

 

[jdash]

and lol, I haven't read a single Harry Potter book or seen the movie, don't really have any interest in it so I will take your word for it that it is good (sort of looked a little 'stupid' to me, sorry )

 

Everyone to their own opinion I guess.

 

James

 

_________________

 

James Dasher - http://www.karateforums.com/forums/images/smiles/karate.gif

 

[ This Message was edited by: jamesdasher on 2002-04-17 15:33 ]

[YODA]

Yes - JRRT wrote The Hobbit first - then LOTR, Then later he went back & made a few ammendments to The Hobbit so that things gel better.

 

I read all the Harry Potter books to my youngest daughter - we loved them & look forward to the new one! But they're not in the same class as LOTR.

 

..... and don't get me started on Star Wars

 

 

[tigerstyle18]

Why did I think the Hobbit was written after LOTR. Sometimes these useless bits of faulty information just get lodged in my brain.