Jump to content
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt

Recommended Posts

  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • Replies 23
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

I thought it was a good book and interesting read. I can't say I agree with everything he said.

One point is about Funakoshi not knowing the bunkai or how to break the kata down. If Itosu was training him and others to take over as royal guards, he had to be teaching them the bunkai and meaning of the katas, and having them train and research them. If the king came back and Funakoshi and others didn't know the applications, it would have taken them more time (years probably), to really learn and understand them and they wouldn't have been able to do their job.

I think its more likely that after the king died and Itosu decided to let Karate be taught to the public (and in schools), that there was an agreement not to show the more dangerous and brutal bunkai.

Interesting book though!

Posted

It is well known that Funakoshi DID know a lot about bunkai and that he emphasized it a lot. Sensei McCarthy, a modern bunkai master, always credits Funakoshi's knowledge of applications.

The story about Itosu deciding not to teach the "secret", "brutal", "maiming", or "killing" applications of karate sounds a lot like mythology, and I, for one, would bet it is.

ossu

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...