Jump to content
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt

Hands and weapons


Recommended Posts

  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt

Well, "just" is such a limiting word. Weapons are not just extensions, nor of merely the hand. The hand itself is an extension, an extension of you, but it is not merely just. Indeed, it is a part of you. As well, so should a weapon be a part of you, when you wield it.

"When you are able to take the keys from my hand, you will be ready to drive." - Shaolin DMV Test


Intro

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One thing I really learned in fencing is treating your sword/blade as a part of yourself. Once you get used to the weapon, your movements become natural. You no longer feel uneasy with your stance. The first time I ever held a fencing blade,I felt really uneasy, but once you get used to it, you become more relaxed, your reactions faster and you have better point control.

The stronger swordsman does not always win.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awareness can extend the sense of self to anything really but in reality weapons are tools. Just something you learn to use with your hands and body in unison. By learning weapons you are learning tools. Tools allow you to be more effective. Your extended sense of self is mearly a byproduct. You could use the same logic/ideology to say that your opponent is an extension of your self in a fight as well, you're just waiting to establish control of it, the same way you do when you pick up a stick.

The only two things that stand between an effective art and one that isn't are a tradition to draw knowledge from and the mind to practice it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Your opponent presents a sentience of its own, and therefore does not quite 'cooperate' with this concept of extension of self. As an idealism, yes, but otherwise not practical nor logical. On the other hand, it is practical to visualize weapons as extensions.

"When you are able to take the keys from my hand, you will be ready to drive." - Shaolin DMV Test


Intro

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Your opponent presents a sentience of its own, and therefore does not quite 'cooperate' with this concept of extension of self.

If you have control he doesn't have to.

As an idealism, yes, but otherwise not practical nor logical. On the other hand, it is practical to visualize weapons as extensions.

I think this all depends on when and how you "pick up the stick". I find it very practical.

The only two things that stand between an effective art and one that isn't are a tradition to draw knowledge from and the mind to practice it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Your opponent presents a sentience of its own, and therefore does not quite 'cooperate' with this concept of extension of self.

If you have control he doesn't have to.

Hehe, and the magic word is, "if." :brow:

"When you are able to take the keys from my hand, you will be ready to drive." - Shaolin DMV Test


Intro

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well yea, you have to gain control first. That's never assumed. I just find it's easier to get there with certain conceptualizations.

The only two things that stand between an effective art and one that isn't are a tradition to draw knowledge from and the mind to practice it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...