Goju_boi Posted August 9, 2005 Share Posted August 9, 2005 from "Hustle and Flow": It's not the size of the dog in the fight , but the size of the fight in the dog". https://www.samuraimartialsports.com for your source of Karate,Kobudo,Aikido,And Kung-Fu Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KempoTiger Posted August 9, 2005 Author Share Posted August 9, 2005 from "Hustle and Flow": It's not the size of the dog in the fight , but the size of the fight in the dog"....You trying to make me not see that movie? heh "Question oneself, before you question others" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yamesu Posted August 9, 2005 Share Posted August 9, 2005 Bruce Lee brigs up some really good points in his books about the above points. (except the movie hustleflow thing.) "We did not inherit this earth from our parents. We are borrowing it from our children." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sauzin Posted August 9, 2005 Share Posted August 9, 2005 Traditional MAists train with rules of ettiquete, restrictions of style, plus any rules put on their sport forms (If there is a sport form). Because etiquette obviously gets in the way of learning? And aside from having a style what restrictions are these? Are you saying for example that we couldn't do a technique just because it's not in our style? That's not the case, it's just with a style comes different and often better ways of doing the same things. Each style has this, even styles that don't call themselves styles have this. So where's the restriction relative to any one else? You can't know everything. In my opinion the important thing is that what you know works.In my opinion this represents what I consider to be a mass misinterpretation of traditional arts. We don't all sit in rooms training under a certain set of conditions while choosing to ignore the changing reality of fighting in the outside world. In fact I'd say most of us don't. Sure we use kata but we apply them directly to relevant fighting in the real world. Truly traditional arts have always been focused on real world fighting. Not sport rules or dojo rules. What makes a traditional art so valuable is it's timelessness. How it can be applied to fighting in the now just as well as the past. Otherwise why would they have existed for so long? Sentimentality? I don't think that would be a very well informed conclusion. The only two things that stand between an effective art and one that isn't are a tradition to draw knowledge from and the mind to practice it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Goju_boi Posted August 9, 2005 Share Posted August 9, 2005 "...You trying to make me not see that movie? heh"whats wrong with Hustle and Flow? https://www.samuraimartialsports.com for your source of Karate,Kobudo,Aikido,And Kung-Fu Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UseoForce Posted August 10, 2005 Share Posted August 10, 2005 Sauzin said:"the important thing is that what you know works"Certainly.Sorry, perhaps I should be more specific. Certainly respect should be paramount, but no more so than anywhere else in life. Just be polite . "In my opinion this represents what I consider to be a mass misinterpretation of traditional arts. We don't all sit in rooms training under a certain set of conditions while choosing to ignore the changing reality of fighting in the outside world. In fact I'd say most of us don't. Sure we use kata but we apply them directly to relevant fighting in the real world. Truly traditional arts have always been focused on real world fighting. Not sport rules or dojo rules."If you train this way, great . I could go on, but i'm hungry. If it works, use it!If not, throw it out! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Goju_boi Posted August 10, 2005 Share Posted August 10, 2005 "I could go on, but i'm hungry."I just had dinner he he https://www.samuraimartialsports.com for your source of Karate,Kobudo,Aikido,And Kung-Fu Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BLueDevil Posted August 10, 2005 Share Posted August 10, 2005 I suppose I'm wrong and wherever you live Shorin, Li Mu Bai is the scourge of the bar scene, but I was merely hoping to bring some intelligable discussion as to why many martial artists get creamed in street fights, despite how the theories and techniques they learn are far superior to just brute strength and flailing arms.Fight the person not the style. There is no teacher but the enemy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Goju_boi Posted August 11, 2005 Share Posted August 11, 2005 but the style is a big factor sometimes https://www.samuraimartialsports.com for your source of Karate,Kobudo,Aikido,And Kung-Fu Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Muaythaiboxer Posted August 11, 2005 Share Posted August 11, 2005 yes it is but the reson for that is because certain styles usually train harder than others. just look at boxers/muay thai/MMA they do hours of techniques and working the bags and doing full contact then they go run and lift weights. mean wile the majority of schools do there kata and basics then do a little light contact sparing for an hour or to then go home and come back a couple days later to do it again. im shure that if a TMA guy trained as hard as a boxer of a MMA fighter then he would be able to use his art to fight but lets face it the average TMA guy does not train as hard as the average boxer or kickboxer. Fist visible Strike invisible Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now