dippedappe Posted September 6, 2005 Author Posted September 6, 2005 (edited) The only high kick I would do in a real fight, intentionally atleast, is high sidekick, and front kick. Maybe a flying sidekick, because it just feels like the right thing to do in certain situations. Edited September 6, 2005 by dippedappe
Menjo Posted September 6, 2005 Posted September 6, 2005 yea same, id use it if the opportunity really presented itself enough for minimal risk. "Time is what we want most, but what we use worst"William Penn
dippedappe Posted September 6, 2005 Author Posted September 6, 2005 And about it being unwise to get the enemy behind you is not a very good reason.You shouldn't be taken down in a fight either, but still it can happen. So it would be a good idea to learn defensive techniques for when you are lying down. Its the same with fighting enemies behind you, it can happen.
dippedappe Posted September 6, 2005 Author Posted September 6, 2005 yea same, id use it if the opportunity really presented itself enough for minimal risk.I don't really think the risk is very high when doing sidekick or flying sidekick.You can do both at a fairly close range, and straight forward. Nothing real fansy.
Menjo Posted September 6, 2005 Posted September 6, 2005 ive kicked a guy in the air when he tried to do flying side kick do so i know im not gunna try it myself, i dont care what people tell me. Also if i was to use side kick, id kick to the knee or stomach...or their hand if it had a weapon... "Time is what we want most, but what we use worst"William Penn
dippedappe Posted September 6, 2005 Author Posted September 6, 2005 Also if i was to use side kick, id kick to the knee or stomach...or their hand if it had a weapon...A side kick to the weapon-hand? Thats probably the last of the kicks I would consider to use for disarming an opponent. I'd say that roundhouse kick is better suited for that.
Menjo Posted September 7, 2005 Posted September 7, 2005 Also if i was to use side kick, id kick to the knee or stomach...or their hand if it had a weapon...A side kick to the weapon-hand? Thats probably the last of the kicks I would consider to use for disarming an opponent. I'd say that roundhouse kick is better suited for that.It worked for me when i was attacked with a knife.... "Time is what we want most, but what we use worst"William Penn
dippedappe Posted September 7, 2005 Author Posted September 7, 2005 Also if i was to use side kick, id kick to the knee or stomach...or their hand if it had a weapon...A side kick to the weapon-hand? Thats probably the last of the kicks I would consider to use for disarming an opponent. I'd say that roundhouse kick is better suited for that.It worked for me when i was attacked with a knife....You must have a fast side kick. I would have to use roundhouse to be fast enough to pull that stunt off.
Goju_boi Posted September 8, 2005 Posted September 8, 2005 I think a front kick is better than either of those kicks,because it's quick and painfull https://www.samuraimartialsports.com for your source of Karate,Kobudo,Aikido,And Kung-Fu
Menjo Posted September 8, 2005 Posted September 8, 2005 i agree, just depends on situation, person, and thier body type really... "Time is what we want most, but what we use worst"William Penn
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now