DUALZ Posted July 19, 2005 Posted July 19, 2005 I just started Thai Boxing, and I've also been lifting weights for a while and like my size. I am about 5-7 and weigh about 170lbs, but most of the guys my height at the gym I take boxing, weigh about 130 - 150lbs Which happens to be my weight class if I don't lift. and Iam thinking that maybe it's best that I lost some weight. Any you guyz lifting heavy while training.
elbows_and_knees Posted July 19, 2005 Posted July 19, 2005 nothing wrong with it. pretty much all pro fighters lift. Here is the issue you may run into though, if you compete - it's an issue that I have - you will fight people taller than you most of the time. Consequently, you will need to get on the inside of your opponents and eat them up there - like tyson did back in the day.
Muaythaiboxer Posted July 20, 2005 Posted July 20, 2005 yea you got to play out your advantages. elbows and knees had a good comparison to tyson Fist visible Strike invisible
CagedWarrior Posted August 7, 2005 Posted August 7, 2005 I lift heavy, training more for strength and power than size (although that doesn't mean I won't gain some size in the process.) The trick is to work it around your training so it doesn't interfere. For instance, if your legs happen to get particularly sore when you lift with them, don't do them the day before you'll need them with whatever training you're doing.
Muaythaiboxer Posted August 8, 2005 Posted August 8, 2005 i like to alternate heavy weights-low reps, with light weights high reps i find that this is what works for me the best for strenth, and i have found plyametrics better than weights for speed and strenth. Fist visible Strike invisible
Goju_boi Posted August 8, 2005 Posted August 8, 2005 weights help out your game big time,so I say go with them,just stick to a lean diet and you will be fine https://www.samuraimartialsports.com for your source of Karate,Kobudo,Aikido,And Kung-Fu
elbows_and_knees Posted August 8, 2005 Posted August 8, 2005 i like to alternate heavy weights-low reps, with light weights high reps i find that this is what works for me the best for strenth, and i have found plyametrics better than weights for speed and strenth.not for strength... they can't be, since the resistance isn't progressive.
Muaythaiboxer Posted August 9, 2005 Posted August 9, 2005 that is why you do more plyametrics when it is no longer a challenge. Fist visible Strike invisible
Goju_boi Posted August 9, 2005 Posted August 9, 2005 what are plyometrics? https://www.samuraimartialsports.com for your source of Karate,Kobudo,Aikido,And Kung-Fu
elbows_and_knees Posted August 9, 2005 Posted August 9, 2005 that is why you do more plyametrics when it is no longer a challenge.No. when you add more, it becomes an endurance exercise, same as pushups. Who is stronger, someone who can do 100 pushups and only bench 135 or someone who can only do 50 pushups and bench 285? Strength is progressive. Progressive exercise with no weight is an endurance builder. Plyometrics are to build explosiveness. many plyo programs do not advocate more than 8-10 reps of an exercise. They are to be done HARD and explosively. Once you begin to draw them out, you are lessening their effectiveness.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now