Daedalus Posted July 31, 2005 Share Posted July 31, 2005 I will not give a black belt out to an A-hole no matter how good he is. He can go to Willy Wanka's Dojo down the street. "Don't let the door it you on the way out!" I see you studied TKD at some point, how did it work for you there?At the place I attended it took about 2-3 years to get a blackbelt if you were in relatively good shape. They had belt testing every 2 months or so, and they charged a small fee for belt promotions.Sounds about the norm. An 8 week cycle. TKD is easy, you just got to stick with it. How far did you get? I have a quarterly (12 week) cycle, every week has a focus and it just repeats per cycle.I got to red belt before moving to Arizona where I took up Wado Ryu Karate at the Scottsdale Martial Arts center. Peace and may God be with you...Deus Ex Remake Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
White Warlock Posted July 31, 2005 Share Posted July 31, 2005 I currently train in BJJ and we don't even have belt promotion testing. A person is usually considered for promotion when they are consistently tapping out people of a higher rank. When someone is ready to move up in rank the head instructor gives him his belt at the end of class. Our belt system is as follows:WhiteBluePurpleBrownBlackBlack takes 8-10 years in most cases.seems to show prejudice to women, handicapped and elderly, giving belts based on being tough, vibrant and young, as well as skilled.Not sure i entirely agree with this. in fact, i know i don't. "When you are able to take the keys from my hand, you will be ready to drive." - Shaolin DMV TestIntro Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
USCMAAI Posted July 31, 2005 Share Posted July 31, 2005 I remember asking my Sensei this question many years ago "Sensei how long will it take me to get to black belt" his answer "Not long and Forever". After 33years in the arts I understand!....who ever said I was a little slow!....lol "Not every tiger will pounce, but every tiger may!"K.MabonUnited States Combat Martial Arts Association International Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MasterH Posted July 31, 2005 Share Posted July 31, 2005 I remember asking my Sensei this question many years ago "Sensei how long will it take me to get to black belt" his answer "Not long and Forever". After 33years in the arts I understand!....who ever said I was a little slow!....lolA little slow, you're just a glutt'n for punishment. And you love it, as I. Adam (Fluffy) Huntleyhttps://www.rleeermey.comhttps://www.martialartsindustry.net Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MasterH Posted July 31, 2005 Share Posted July 31, 2005 I will not give a black belt out to an A-hole no matter how good he is. He can go to Willy Wanka's Dojo down the street. "Don't let the door it you on the way out!" I see you studied TKD at some point, how did it work for you there?At the place I attended it took about 2-3 years to get a blackbelt if you were in relatively good shape. They had belt testing every 2 months or so, and they charged a small fee for belt promotions.Sounds about the norm. An 8 week cycle. TKD is easy, you just got to stick with it. How far did you get? I have a quarterly (12 week) cycle, every week has a focus and it just repeats per cycle.I got to red belt before moving to Arizona where I took up Wado Ryu Karate at the Scottsdale Martial Arts center.What org? WTF, ITF, ATA? I'm just curious. Tell me to shut-up if you want. Adam (Fluffy) Huntleyhttps://www.rleeermey.comhttps://www.martialartsindustry.net Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rateh Posted July 31, 2005 Share Posted July 31, 2005 I currently train in BJJ and we don't even have belt promotion testing. A person is usually considered for promotion when they are consistently tapping out people of a higher rank. When someone is ready to move up in rank the head instructor gives him his belt at the end of class. Our belt system is as follows:WhiteBluePurpleBrownBlackBlack takes 8-10 years in most cases.seems to show prejudice to women, handicapped and elderly, giving belts based on being tough, vibrant and young, as well as skilled.Not sure i entirely agree with this. in fact, i know i don't.agreedive said it before, but im a very small femaleim afraid with this sort of promotion method, i wouldnt get very farnot that i wouldnt know what i was doing...but against bigger and stronger opponents, it would be more of a case of escaping being tapped out, then being able to tap them outalso a strong guy would be able to tap out weaker people just above his rank, without having as good of techniqueand come to think of it...since stronger people would be able to be promoted easier then the weaker/smaller...then the higher ranks would be made of the stronger people, thus making it even more difficult for one such as myself to make it anywhere in the ranking system Your present circumstances don't determine where you can go; they merely determine where you start. - Nido Qubein Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
White Warlock Posted July 31, 2005 Share Posted July 31, 2005 Yep, and such a format would inevitably undermine the quality of instruction, with 'power' and 'strength' being touted as superior to 'technique' and 'conditioning.' In time, such an approach could... in fact would... erode the system, turning it into a "good ol' boy's" 'tough' guy academy. "When you are able to take the keys from my hand, you will be ready to drive." - Shaolin DMV TestIntro Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Daedalus Posted August 1, 2005 Share Posted August 1, 2005 Yep, and such a format would inevitably undermine the quality of instruction, with 'power' and 'strength' being touted as superior to 'technique' and 'conditioning.' In time, such an approach could... in fact would... erode the system, turning it into a "good ol' boy's" 'tough' guy academy.BTW I'm 5'4 and 130lbs and can tap out people in my class that weigh anywhere from 160-220, because I've always been rolling at 100% with bigger guys. My technique HAS to be better then theirs to keep up. Actually I find the system has forced me to be alot better then I would be otherwise. But again we are all entitled to our opinion and I respect that you guys have your own. Peace and may God be with you...Deus Ex Remake Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MasterH Posted August 1, 2005 Share Posted August 1, 2005 Yep, and such a format would inevitably undermine the quality of instruction, with 'power' and 'strength' being touted as superior to 'technique' and 'conditioning.' In time, such an approach could... in fact would... erode the system, turning it into a "good ol' boy's" 'tough' guy academy.BTW I'm 5'4 and 130lbs and can tap out people in my class that weigh anywhere from 160-220, because I've always been rolling at 100% with bigger guys. My technique HAS to be better then theirs to keep up. Actually I find the system has forced me to be alot better then I would be otherwise. But again we are all entitled to our opinion and I respect that you guys have your own.I have no dout you do just fine, but when it comes to TKD I'm more interested with quality of teq, rather than how much booty that person can kick. I'm a 32 y/o master, what does that mean? Can I beat every 21 y/o that earns a chodan? Sure I can hold my own, do some dammage on the way down, but I'll be going down. And afterward I by the guy a beer, because that's the kind of guy I am, but we have older people taking classes, women taking classes, and yes children. We need a more comprehensive way with dealing with promotions. The Millitary, a good example. The best and britest make the Officers corps. But they may not have all the skills that some E-1 private has out of boot. So, should a Lt C. be compared to a Private, and said Private may be able to kick his tail be promoted to a higher rank because he may be able to run the Lt.C into the ground. Of course not, there is much more to it. Where I come from there is simply much more to it than being able to tap someone out. And that's what I test people on. Adam (Fluffy) Huntleyhttps://www.rleeermey.comhttps://www.martialartsindustry.net Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Adonis Posted August 3, 2005 Share Posted August 3, 2005 Depends on what course. Some BJJ adacdemies have children classes. Its based off of how well they tranistion and perfom the techniques as well as how well they can apply them moves on upper belts as well as there own. If they are at least hanging with blue belts giving them heck! THen alot of acadimies will promote them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now