McNerny Posted July 9, 2005 Share Posted July 9, 2005 Hey everyone, I just was curious as to what you all feel is more effective in the ring, the ground n' pound strategy or the forced tapout with a lock or a choke. I have seen them both work often, I just would like to know which you all feel works best. Thanks A good technique is beautiful but a beautiful technique is not always good. -Hirokazu Kanazawa Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
parkerlineage Posted July 10, 2005 Share Posted July 10, 2005 I'm not going to vote yet, because I don't know exactly to what you refer. "Ground and Pound" as in knock them down and beat on them from on top, or from standing, or something else? And in what context do you mean "in the ring?" Like, tourney sparring, or some other kind?My initial reflex would be to vote for both - submission, then drop 'em and stomp/kick from standing...but that's just the Kenpo in me.Peace;Parkerlineage American Kenpo Karate- First Degree Black Belt"He who hesitates, meditates in a horizontal position."Ed Parker Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
McNerny Posted July 10, 2005 Author Share Posted July 10, 2005 Hey parkerlineage, By ground n' pound I mean from the position where the "pounder" is either mounted on the guy or kneeling next to him. I was refering to NHB events such as the UFC when I said "in the ring". I apologize for the lack of specification. A good technique is beautiful but a beautiful technique is not always good. -Hirokazu Kanazawa Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
parkerlineage Posted July 10, 2005 Share Posted July 10, 2005 In that case, beat 'em. You can't lock up somebody that has the will to fight back, and what better way to kill that will than beating the fight from them?Thanks for the clarification. American Kenpo Karate- First Degree Black Belt"He who hesitates, meditates in a horizontal position."Ed Parker Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
y2_sub Posted July 11, 2005 Share Posted July 11, 2005 Take them to the ground and then lock or choke them was always one of my favorites . However , beeting the hell out of them first is essential Moon might shine upon the innocent and the guilty alike Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ItalianMuayThai Posted July 12, 2005 Share Posted July 12, 2005 id say for the average untrained person, ground and pound, but with trained fighters, i dont know the tables could turned ~ You first mistake is to underestimate ~ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fat Donkey Posted July 12, 2005 Share Posted July 12, 2005 As a long time MA guy and new BJJ guy I gotta say submit. 1) It's very hard to ground and pound an experienced ground fighter, 2) It's tiring 3) U have to have positioning before u can G&P 4) In a self defense situation u can end up seriously hurting and or killing someone whilst if u submit them then u can decide what to do to them. and finally alot of people will submit quickly, but take a hell of a pounding. Donkey Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Armbar Posted July 14, 2005 Share Posted July 14, 2005 GnP, all the way. Something I heard that's always stuck with me is if you tap a guy out, he feels alright about it. But if you pound on them, its more tramatic and they won't forget it. "Achieving victory in every battle is not absolute perfection. Neutralizing an adversary’s forces without battle is perfection."Sun-Tzu, The Art of War Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SubGrappler Posted July 14, 2005 Share Posted July 14, 2005 I think its hard to say which is "better" since both approaches to combat have been rather successful.In my eyes:Pros of G&P:1. Easily applicable- you dont need great ground skills in order to ground and pound and there is no need to pass the guard to attain a better position.2. Its harder for your opponent to escape from the bottom position of guard than say cross side or full mount.3. Time limits mean that finishing the fight is not neccessary with G&P- constantly pounding your opponent until the match ends isnt a bad way to win a fight.Pros of the Submission Game1. Fighters are always a threat, regardless of how late into the match they are. It could be argued that as fighters tire, they'll lose power on their punches.2. Its hard to knock someone out from inside the guard, even if they're inexperienced, because of the amount of control they can have if they decide to simply hold you.3. Some guys have chins made of granite making them exceptionally difficult to knock out- no one is "submission proof" though.4. Passing through the heirarchy of positions gives the attacker more options as he gets better positions.5. Submissions can be used against any opponent from virtually any position- G&P can only be used from the top position. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
y2_sub Posted July 14, 2005 Share Posted July 14, 2005 GnP, all the way. Something I heard that's always stuck with me is if you tap a guy out, he feels alright about it. But if you pound on them, its more tramatic and they won't forget it.Man .. your goal is to beat him not to take care about what he thinks .. beat your opponent and he will never forget about it , belive me ..I totally agree with Fat Donkey's post Moon might shine upon the innocent and the guilty alike Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now