dippedappe Posted August 30, 2005 Posted August 30, 2005 well I've heard that the reason that they do forms like that is for conditioning and the starnge movements are to conceal some of the applications.Not entirely true.They do the forms for the same reason as any style do forms. To learn and rehearse combat-movements and all that. But they do not fight like they do forms.And the strange movements are generating a lot of power. Someone once told me that it was "power hidden in elegance".
Goju_boi Posted August 30, 2005 Author Posted August 30, 2005 well I'm just saying what I read in a issue of blackbelt magazine https://www.samuraimartialsports.com for your source of Karate,Kobudo,Aikido,And Kung-Fu
dippedappe Posted August 30, 2005 Posted August 30, 2005 well I'm just saying what I read in a issue of blackbelt magazineThat's odd...weird. Maybe I have misunderstood what the magazine wrote. I don't know.
Goju_boi Posted September 2, 2005 Author Posted September 2, 2005 it was in a recent issue of the magazine https://www.samuraimartialsports.com for your source of Karate,Kobudo,Aikido,And Kung-Fu
Infrazael Posted September 9, 2005 Posted September 9, 2005 well I've heard that the reason that they do forms like that is for conditioning and the starnge movements are to conceal some of the applications.Not entirely true.They do the forms for the same reason as any style do forms. To learn and rehearse combat-movements and all that. But they do not fight like they do forms.And the strange movements are generating a lot of power. Someone once told me that it was "power hidden in elegance".Elegance is merely a byproduct of CERTAIN techniques that ACTUALLY WORK.Elegance should NOT be present for elegance's sake. Look at Tai Ji; the movements are done because THEY WORK. Purposely making a system or form "elegant" is a TRAVESTY to martial arts IMO.
Goju_boi Posted September 10, 2005 Author Posted September 10, 2005 "Purposely making a system or form "elegant" is a TRAVESTY to martial arts IMO."a good example of that is that XtremeMartualArts stuff. https://www.samuraimartialsports.com for your source of Karate,Kobudo,Aikido,And Kung-Fu
Infrazael Posted September 20, 2005 Posted September 20, 2005 Which is why I talk crap about XMA all the time.
Goju_boi Posted September 20, 2005 Author Posted September 20, 2005 lol,I've kind of noticed.I don't mind seeing it though,but I don't think I would practice it. https://www.samuraimartialsports.com for your source of Karate,Kobudo,Aikido,And Kung-Fu
elbows_and_knees Posted September 23, 2005 Posted September 23, 2005 Elegance is merely a byproduct of CERTAIN techniques that ACTUALLY WORK.Elegance should NOT be present for elegance's sake. Look at Tai Ji; the movements are done because THEY WORK. Purposely making a system or form "elegant" is a TRAVESTY to martial arts IMO.Not because they work, but because they CAN work - nothing is absolute. This is why you will find XMA guys out there who could beat TMA. At the core of what they do is the same basic technique that TMA learn. The problem with XMA isn't the flash, but the training method - they ONLY train for XMA related competitions and such. I bet I could take an XMA guy, train him for the ring and he'd hold his own, using his techniques. They key is in the training method, not in the style.
Goju_boi Posted September 24, 2005 Author Posted September 24, 2005 I know they could hold their own.Those people are heavily conditioned. https://www.samuraimartialsports.com for your source of Karate,Kobudo,Aikido,And Kung-Fu
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now