SevenStar Posted February 11, 2005 Posted February 11, 2005 there are some differences, but there's plenty of crossover as well. you wouldn't have to forget EVERYTHING, I wouldn't think...
HanSword Posted February 11, 2005 Posted February 11, 2005 >>the training methods make the fighter. I absolutely agree SS , but a lot of training method is determined by style . I completely agree. However, within certain styles, different methods are used. In sport styles, it's fairly consistent. In TMA styles, that's not always the case. that's why I separate the two. yes , that's right . this is why I am more drawn to and have greater respect for " sport styles " , because everything is transparent and open - it is fairly easy to define what methods it actually uses. whereas with a lot of TMAs , as you have said , the methods can vary wildy even within the same would be style and so does the quality , since usually the " extra " curiculla stuff cannot be field tested as it is not allowed in their competition rules . yet they try to be all things to all men . I'm sorry I don't understand that and I don't buy it either .
Muaythaiboxer Posted February 12, 2005 Posted February 12, 2005 my boxing has helped alot with my muay thai and if anything my hands are better than most of the MT guys my age. Fist visible Strike invisible
1kickKO Posted February 15, 2005 Posted February 15, 2005 Han, whereso in Malaysia do you live? I have a friend who lives in Kuala Lumpur.
dingyuan Posted February 17, 2005 Posted February 17, 2005 In terms of pure strikes, I believe Muay Thai has no rival, the only weakness of Muay Thai is the lack of throws that those San Shou guys have.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now