Piastre Posted January 14, 2002 Share Posted January 14, 2002 I know very little about the history of the Korean arts, so perhaps one of the TKD afficionados could answer my query. Recently I read that after an invasion in the early part of the last century, Japanese martial arts were introduced to Korea to create a striking art (Tang Soo Do/Karate) and a grappling art (Hapkido/Aikido), and that subsequently the Korean government moved to create a blend of the two, which ultimately became Taekwondo. Another person told me that Taekwondo originated during fuedal times, and the high kicks that are associated with TKD today were designed to knock a man off horseback. Can somebody please separate that fact from the mythology for me?!?! [ This Message was edited by: Piastre on 2002-01-13 20:52 ] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KickChick Posted January 14, 2002 Share Posted January 14, 2002 There are various sites on the web where you can obtain the history of TKD. (I don't want to post it all here since it is way too lengthy .... but I like this particular account) http://ryanshroyer.tripod.com/david_jewell.html The high kicks and of course the "horse stance" originated from ancient horseback fighting and evolved in to many of the practiced hyungs (katas) of TKD. I know there was a thread somewhere here in the TKD forum on history of TKD but I couldn't find it _________________ ITF/TKD Black Belt (1st dan)/Fitness Kickboxing Instructor (KarateForums Sensei) [ This Message was edited by: KickChick on 2002-01-14 12:25 ] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Piastre Posted January 14, 2002 Author Share Posted January 14, 2002 Thanks for the link Kickchick Very informative. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iamrushman Posted January 14, 2002 Share Posted January 14, 2002 let me see if i can do that fancy link thing.............. http://www.ifroggy.com/karateforums/forums/viewtopic.php?topic=786&forum=7&14 cool it work..here's the tkd history thread.... _________________ rushman (karate forums sensei) 3rd dan wtf/kukkiwon "saying nothing...sometimes says the most"--e. dickerson [ This Message was edited by: iamrushman on 2002-01-14 18:26 ] rushman (karate forums sensei)3rd dan wtf/kukkiwon"saying nothing...sometimes says the most"--e. dickerson Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KickChick Posted January 14, 2002 Share Posted January 14, 2002 ah! THERE IT IS!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deathcometh Posted February 22, 2002 Share Posted February 22, 2002 I thought it was introduced by Japan like you said. I don't know who told you the other sorry. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mastertae Posted February 24, 2002 Share Posted February 24, 2002 well it is currently known that not all of taekwondo came from japan...infact they found photos in the korean sewers a few months before the japanese invasion...but since japan did mangae to take over korea....some japanese arts probably were incorporated thus you actually have a blend of old and new!...also if you look at ancient texts some describe japanese delegates learning Soo Bak Do...which is an ancient form of taekwondo...from the korean royal guards...so japanese and korean arts have been evolving together for centuries...though neither country is willing to admit this...there are korean blood lines in the japanese blood lines and vice versa...there were many taekyons schools that were put together after the war obviouly they had to make some changes so they had to incorporate the japanese arts as well....to both histories are correct! Is it not easier to strike a mountain than it is to strike a fly! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yosis Posted August 1, 2004 Share Posted August 1, 2004 Taekwondo originated during fuedal times during the koreans verison of the three kingdoms and Shilla kingdom overcame the other two kingdoms. that was the first form of korean tae kwon do. it didn't really change that much until the monguls invaded china and then korea. I can't remember the general that changed tkd in the 50's but that was what you are learning today. HEROS ARE NORMAL MEN PUT INTO EXTRAORNARY SITUATIONS Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DLopez Posted August 1, 2004 Share Posted August 1, 2004 I've noticed that the common prevailing notion is that all Korean martial arts are a direct descendant of Japanese martial arts. From what I've been reading from various sources, that notion is a one-sided idea, originating from the Japanese side and hence, propagated by proponents of Japanese martial arts. In fact, some sources I've read indicate that ancient Korean martial arts were more influenced by China (Koreans adopted techniques to combat Chinese invaders), and that the flow of martial arts influence may actually have gone from Korea to Japan, not the other way around. Here is an online source that echoes this: completemartialarts.com Navigate to: "Home: Information: Styles: Korean Martial Arts", Click on titles: History of Korean Martial Arts by In Sun Seo History of Korean Martial Arts by Jane Hallander You have to be more specific when you ask "when did Taekwondo originate?" Are you talking about the style created after the end of WWII, or are you simply using a generic term for indigenous martial arts that existed in ancient times that are Korean in origin? I don't know modern TKD, so I won't try to separate how much is Japanese and how much is Korean, but I think it's safe to say that there is enough difference in TKD and say, Karate, to conclude that TKD is not just a Karate rip-off - it contains some uniquely Korean methods. Beware!! Separating fact from mythology in martial arts is a lot like discussing religion or politics, so be ready for some wack opinions to be proffered and hotly defended! DeanDahn Boh Nim - Black-Brown BeltKuk Sool Won"Dream as if you'll live forever. Live as if you'll die tomorrow." - James Dean Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tommarker Posted August 2, 2004 Share Posted August 2, 2004 i have come to the conclusion that one can completely master the art as it now stands without really giving a flying frig either way. If I want perspective on Jindo, I'll look at Gankaku, then Chinte, and some Shaolin White Crane, and maybe I'll change it. I'm sure in the past, all three have played a role on each other. Who cares if someone thought of it first? I'm sure the first wheel Grok carved out of a piece of stone was a real turd compared to a Goodyear radial. And on the flip side, there are some things that were made 100 years ago that will outlive the shortsided cheaply produced crud of today. If someone wants to think that their art was handed down to them directly from boddhidharma in an unbroken 3000 year old chain, how does that affect your training? If someone wants to remain ignorant, it is certainly their choice, as the truth - in all its varying shades and degrees -- is out there somewhere. I'm no longer posting here. Adios. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts