Jump to content
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt

Recommended Posts

Posted

To all the kenpo/kempo guys out there - do you train in forms/patterns/kata at your club?

 

If so, where are they from? Are they taken from karate or from Chinese styles (for example) or are they forms that kenpo practitioners have developed for use in kenpo schools?

"Was it really worth it? Only time and death may ever tell..." The Beautiful South - The Rose of My Cologne


Sheffield Steelers!

  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
Posted

I'd like to learn more about kenpo forms, history etc. Any good sites, perhaps video?

Posted

Description of Okinawan Kenpo (the art I practice) Lineage:

 

http://www.argedon.de/akka/history/okinawakempo.htm

 

A nice chart to go with it:

 

http://www.ikkf.org/lineage.html

 

Now here is a good list of some of the different Kenpo's you'll see:

 

http://www.martial-arts-toplinks.com/Top_Sports_Martial_Arts_Kenpo_Schools_and_Instruction.html

 

In this list you will find some American, Dillman, Chinese, and stuff they didn't really have any other name for so they called it Kenpo. Interestingly enough, Kenpo or Ch'uan (fist) Fa (law) in Chinese can be applied to just about any art derived from the multitude of different Shaolin schools. So lets see we have a couple of different lineages here theres,

 

Okinawan Kenpo which goes:

 

Wooping Crane>Kanryo Higashionna>Shigeru Nakamura>Seiyu Oyata or Seikichi Odo

 

Then there's Dilmans Ryukyu Kenpo which goes:

 

3 seminars from Oyata + Shodan in Issinryu from Jimmy Coffman + Wally Jay small circle jujitsue + some Shotokan>George Dillman

 

Then there's American Kenpo which goes vaguely:

 

Shaolin Temple>James Mitose>William K. S. Chow + Street fighting>Edmund Parker

 

Then there's Hawaiian Kenpo which goes:

 

Shaolin Temple>James Mitose>William K. S. Chow

 

Then there's Chinese Kenpo which goes:

 

Shaolin Temple>????? (there is no way to track the amazing number of branch offs from these arts)

 

I think I got that right. I hope this helps, and believe me I’m confused to.

The only two things that stand between an effective art and one that isn't are a tradition to draw knowledge from and the mind to practice it.

Posted
Then there's American Kenpo which goes vaguely:

 

Shaolin Temple>James Mitose>William K. S. Chow + Street fighting>Edmund Parker

 

Sauzin, pretty good, except for this (quoted). James Mitose is not generally considered to be in the roots of American Kenpo. While Prof. Chow did start out under Mitose, he left early on and concentrated on Chuan fa, or the Chinese fighting systems. Mr. Parker learned Chuan fa from Prof. Chow, then other arts from many others. What he did was so radically different from any single system, our system lineage starts with SGM Parker. Think of a family tree, where the root system is extensive, Mr. Parker is the trunk, and there are now several limbs and branches off of that.

 

aefibird, I think we've talked about this before, but as there are a lot of new people here, and we are sort of testing the Kempo waters, I'll go over it again (just skip through if it gets boreing/repetitive :dodgy: ).

 

American Kenpo does forms that were mostly made by Ed Parker, though some of his senior students created or modified some of the forms. I believe it was Mr. Chuck Sullivan that modified our staff form at a test. He got lost in the middle of the form, and just started winging it. Mr. Parker looked at him a while after he closed, then said "I like what you just did better. I think we'll do it that way." So it got revised, as the legend has it.

 

American Kenpo: Our early forms get you started learning how to move. We call it 'building a dictionary of motion'. Later, the forms are made up of parts of techniques, but rearranged. They help us with borrowing, grafting, technique flow, different applications, etc. They are basically more complex versions of our techniques, strung together to teach different concepts. Our techniques themselves you've heard me call 'mini forms', as they are not just single moves. They are a serries of moves strung together in a logical sequence to deal with attacks that have common characteristics. They teach us to move efficiently and effectively under the force of an assault. They are the primary medium through which we learn to use principles and concepts involved in fighting, and their application. Techniques are learned in stages, and are broken down, tore apart, and rearranged just like karateka do when studying bunkai in a form.

 

Chinese Kenpo: My system only has one master form, consisting of all our techniques. But most of the people doing it are useing the system in conjunction with, or as a base onto which to graft other systems. It works extremely well for this, and we get work in forms from those systems. It is Parker based, so the techniques serve the same purpose as in AK. Doing a principles based system, as all Parker based systems are, gives a much deeper understanding of any system or style you study or come in contact with. You get more insight into the bunkai, or true understanding of any systems forms. And, studying or working with other systems gives more insight into Kenpo also.

 

In addition to forms, there are sets which are used to drill basics (Finger Set, Kicking Set, Stance Set, ...).

 

One of the things I like about some of the Okinawan Kempo systems is their forms. They have beautiful flow! AK has flow, but we also have more hard moves. I used to do a two man form, taken from Tracy's Kenpo, and they took it from one of the traditional Kempo systems. When you got going fast with it, man did you get a feel for flow, and for timeing and sensitivity!

 

Getting drug off by my significant other............................

 

Later!

Freedom isn't free!

Posted

Doesn't Kenpo mean Chinese fist?

 

If that's the case, then Chinese kenpo is Chinese Chinese fist?

Posted
Doesn't Kenpo mean Chinese fist?

 

If that's the case, then Chinese kenpo is Chinese Chinese fist?

 

No, Kenpo means "Fist Law"

 

Ken = Fist

 

Po = Law

 

DT

- "Failure is the opportunity to begin again, more intelligently." Benjamin Franklin


-"If you always do what you've always done you'll always be what you've always been." Dale Carnegie

Posted
Doesn't Kenpo mean Chinese fist?

 

If that's the case, then Chinese kenpo is Chinese Chinese fist?

 

No, Kenpo means "Fist Law"

 

Ken = Fist

 

Po = Law

 

DT

 

Someones been paying attention in class.

 

Sup double :)

 

You ready for that test coming up?

Cheers.

-

There are no pure styles of karate. Purity comes only when pure knuckles meet pure flesh no matter who delivers or receives.

-

An ounce of logic can be worth more than a ton of tradition that has become obsolete through the weathering of time.

Posted
Doesn't Kenpo mean Chinese fist?

 

If that's the case, then Chinese kenpo is Chinese Chinese fist?

 

No, Kenpo means "Fist Law"

 

Ken = Fist

 

Po = Law

 

DT

 

Is that Japanese or Hogen? What does 'kem'po mean?

Posted

Japanese.

 

Incidentally, many people on Okinawa referred to the indigenous arts as ti (te in Japanese) and used toudi to refer to Chinese arts. But, both of them became so mixed together on Okinawa anyway, and then they called it karate later.

Martial Arts Blog:http://bujutsublogger.blogspot.com/

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...