ad Posted January 5, 2002 Author Posted January 5, 2002 yeah i know, his voice really does your head in, and with him starring in a movie, bloody hell i dont think i could watch the film , -ad Brown Sash Hsing I/Lau Gar Kung FuBrown Belt San Shou17 yr oldhttp://www.selfdefencehelp.co.uk
kicker Posted January 6, 2002 Posted January 6, 2002 well you know Lennox hes professional and he would have the power over a guy like Prince Nazeem But if someone his size and height and strongness and toughness that came into boxing. That had a chance to beat him but like that could happen soon someone better and the what would happen. amkes me wonder when you do your best it`s going to show. "If you watch the pros, You will learn something new"
ad Posted January 6, 2002 Author Posted January 6, 2002 yeah like mike tyson or hasim rahman Brown Sash Hsing I/Lau Gar Kung FuBrown Belt San Shou17 yr oldhttp://www.selfdefencehelp.co.uk
thaiboxerken Posted January 7, 2002 Posted January 7, 2002 Power = strength * speed isn't quite accurate. Here is the correct equation Power = mass * speed To move mass, one must have some strength and one must also have proper body mechanics. I've seen plenty of super-fast guys that couldn't knock out an infant. I've seen plenty of strong guys that punch a time-card. Strength has a little to do with power, but I don't even try to rely on it. I work on proper body-mechanics. The Thai kick is the laziest kick in the martial arts world, it involves very little muscle. We utilize body mechanics to move our mass into the kick at a fast rate. That's why the kick is so powerful and can be delivered over and over again. Just kick 'em, they'll understand.- Me Apprentice Instructor under Guro Inosanto in Jun Fan Gung Fu and Filipinno Martial arts.Certified Instructor of Frank Cucci's Linxx system of martial arts.
ad Posted January 7, 2002 Author Posted January 7, 2002 for real thaiboxerken, i thought that pervious equation wasnt fully self-explaminatory, but this makes more sense , the thai kick seems to be a fast kick, i personally think the spinning back fist or back fist , is the fastest move using hands, since it is so fast and utilises not much muscle, but then again the lack of muscle reduce alot of power, punches such as the rear uppercut utilise the whole body in effect and would be more powerful, if you could perhaps make the uppercut a more faster attack, then the results im sure would be devastating -ad Brown Sash Hsing I/Lau Gar Kung FuBrown Belt San Shou17 yr oldhttp://www.selfdefencehelp.co.uk
Piastre Posted January 7, 2002 Posted January 7, 2002 It's important to differentiate between "strength" and "power" As stated, power is the rate at which mechanical work is performed. This is dependent on both force (mass x acceleration) and velocity. The best way to achieve both is with correct technique. Being a physicist/mechanical engineer, I could go into much greater detail, but it's really boring!
ramcalgary Posted January 8, 2002 Posted January 8, 2002 lewis is canadian he is a citizen...... Honor is the most important thing a man has once you lose it it is gone forever
TKD_McGee Posted January 9, 2002 Posted January 9, 2002 A person who is strong has more muscle mass therefore he couldn't move as fast in theory.. (Like a big WWF guy) Some people are incredibully muscle bound, and if you were to punch them you would break your arms... Muscle mass has a lot to do with it I think... Do unto others, as they done to you.
Piastre Posted January 9, 2002 Posted January 9, 2002 I suggest anyone interested in the physics of a strike familiarise themselves with the concept of impulse.
g Posted January 10, 2002 Posted January 10, 2002 the thing that gives a punch power is the fact that it moves through the object and for this u need muscle i think there is a basic amount of muscles needed then worry about tecnique then speed
Recommended Posts