47MartialMan Posted October 6, 2004 Share Posted October 6, 2004 you'll find that happens a lot. he attempts to correct someone, Correct? Is that what I am trying to do? either with respects to language or perhaps the subject at hand. Ye Hi. when he gets confronted, he asks more questions whilst avoiding having to answer those posed to him Yes more questions, just as jem had posted to further understand what is being conveyed. OR he passes things as a misunderstanding of the way he types/speaks. Is misunderstanding the same as interpretation or mis-interpretation? just making it nice and clear. Aw, is someone getting "frustrated"? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Drunken Monkey Posted October 6, 2004 Share Posted October 6, 2004 actually when i typed in 'nice and clear' it was in reference with the way i type my post (it=the post) which would explain the the part previously regarding posting in verse. i find it interesting that you saw this as 'frustration'. post count is directly related to how much free time you have, not how intelligent you are."When you have to kill a man it costs nothing to be polite." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
47MartialMan Posted October 6, 2004 Share Posted October 6, 2004 actually when i typed in 'nice and clear' it was in reference with the way i type my post (it=the post) which would explain the the part previously regarding posting in verse. i find it interesting that you saw this as 'frustration'. I "see" now. In slang, where I am from, when one states "nice and clear", it is out of frustration to solidify, without further discussion. Hmmn....back to interpretation/mis-interpretation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JEM618 Posted October 6, 2004 Share Posted October 6, 2004 Take your pick- Does that mean you are not allowed to speak about specific animals? Does it mean: 'I'm not allowed to speak to certain animals.’ ? Here is where interpretation/misinterpretation arises. No, it's not a matter of take your pick. It's a matter of meaning. It's simple grammar, the sentences are not interchangeable. 'to' and 'of' change the meaning of the sentence completely. If you type a funny little quip at the end of a post and someone READS it, then asks you what you meant, or if you meant something else, you should be able to reply. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JEM618 Posted October 6, 2004 Share Posted October 6, 2004 you'll find that happens a lot. he attempts to correct someone, either with respects to language or perhaps the subject at hand. when he gets confronted, he asks more questions whilst avoiding having to answer those posed to him OR he passes things as a misunderstanding of the way he types/speaks. have a look around. you'll see what i mean. and i'm not typing in verse, just making it nice and clear. Who's he? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Drunken Monkey Posted October 6, 2004 Share Posted October 6, 2004 he also doesn't understand the difference between 'understand' and 'interpret'. and um, i'm guessing someone's has warned him about openly baiting me. as to who gave the warning, i have no clue. post count is directly related to how much free time you have, not how intelligent you are."When you have to kill a man it costs nothing to be polite." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JEM618 Posted October 6, 2004 Share Posted October 6, 2004 he also doesn't understand the difference between 'understand' and 'interpret'. and um, i'm guessing someone's has warned him about openly baiting me. as to who gave the warning, i have no clue. DM, who's 'he'? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Drunken Monkey Posted October 6, 2004 Share Posted October 6, 2004 oops, sorry. 47. i think the animal he's not allowed to mention is me. post count is directly related to how much free time you have, not how intelligent you are."When you have to kill a man it costs nothing to be polite." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
47MartialMan Posted October 6, 2004 Share Posted October 6, 2004 oops, sorry. 47. i think the animal he's not allowed to mention is me. No, incorrect. You are not the "animal" that I mention. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
47MartialMan Posted October 6, 2004 Share Posted October 6, 2004 he also doesn't understand the difference between 'understand' and 'interpret'. Understand- 1.to perceive and comprehend significance of 2. to grasp or comprehend the meaning intended or expressed. Interpret- 1.To explain oneself 2. to expound the significance of So is if something is mis-interpreted, it cannot further be misunderstood? If one interprets something, aren't they trying to have someone "undersatnd" something as well?quote] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now