47MartialMan Posted September 15, 2004 Posted September 15, 2004 Since Kano whupped up on the Jiujitsu folks, it hasn't really been a valid argument any how. Yeah, wasnt that amazing. Following Kano's and Morhei's examples to pull away from "tradition"
dear john Posted September 15, 2004 Author Posted September 15, 2004 i talked to one of the more aggressive instructors in jujitsu about the whole sparring vs fighting and he said that even though the master instructor is against it he believes it is good for a while. he likes it because it gives you a chance to get hit and develop reflexes and it helps develop what your lvl of space you want to mantain in a fight. and maybe loose some of the fear but he believes that you should quite after a while once you have developed this because you will develope a muscle memory to not do certain moves or to natural forget about some targets on your body usually avoided in sparring, such as the eyes or the groin. he is not against all forms of all out sparring, just the really limited ones like boxing or TKD sparring. unlike my master instructor he believes that BJJ sparring would be the best type of sparring to do. the funny thing is that i know im wrong and i know your right, yet you keep argueing like it will change my mind. you should really know, you dont have to be right to win:)
47MartialMan Posted September 15, 2004 Posted September 15, 2004 Cool. What is Dan Zan Ryu Zenyo Bujutsu? Does any of these have a link/website?
dear john Posted September 16, 2004 Author Posted September 16, 2004 about 100 years ago in japan there was several different MA's that taught jujitsu. one would be all arm locks the others would be for legs locks another for headlocks and another for throws. i am not for sure what the other ones were. this guy Seishiro Okazaki took them all and put them into one system. he went to hawaii and meet up with some guy who was a master in Okinawan karate and they compined the two. i forget most of the story, but you can read all in https://www.bushidokan.us seriously this is the most in depth grappling MA i have ever seen. all in all there is about 200 to 225 basic techniques and then from there everything turns into a combo. my tae kwon do from what i have seen is made up of a considerably less amount of techniques the funny thing is that i know im wrong and i know your right, yet you keep argueing like it will change my mind. you should really know, you dont have to be right to win:)
47MartialMan Posted September 16, 2004 Posted September 16, 2004 Thanks for the link.....very interesting
dear john Posted September 16, 2004 Author Posted September 16, 2004 is there a site about him? the funny thing is that i know im wrong and i know your right, yet you keep argueing like it will change my mind. you should really know, you dont have to be right to win:)
dear john Posted September 17, 2004 Author Posted September 17, 2004 oh sorry about Kano the funny thing is that i know im wrong and i know your right, yet you keep argueing like it will change my mind. you should really know, you dont have to be right to win:)
SevenStar Posted September 17, 2004 Posted September 17, 2004 about 100 years ago in japan there was several different MA's that taught jujitsu. one would be all arm locks the others would be for legs locks another for headlocks and another for throws. i am not for sure what the other ones were. this guy Seishiro Okazaki took them all and put them into one system. he went to hawaii and meet up with some guy who was a master in Okinawan karate and they compined the two. i forget most of the story, but you can read all in https://www.bushidokan.us At one point in history there were over 700 styles of jujutsu... This guy is claiming he combined ALL of them??
Recommended Posts