Drunken Monkey Posted August 19, 2004 Share Posted August 19, 2004 .....that's one of the problems i think. a lot of people think that there is a stage when there is no more to learn; that there is a final destination. and that is where the belts come in. they don't help the situation. in fact, i think they kinda hinder real development. people get too hung up on the titles and forget about simply being able to 'do'. on the flip side, the belts do serve a purpose and that is to let the instructor know what 'level' you are at. that is what i think the belts are for. they are not for you as a reward or reference of some sort. they are to help the instructor know how/what/when he should be teaching you. post count is directly related to how much free time you have, not how intelligent you are."When you have to kill a man it costs nothing to be polite." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
torris Posted August 19, 2004 Share Posted August 19, 2004 I may be wrong, but the 5th DAN or 6th DAN and higher black are mostly honorary, aren't they. Wouldn't it be that someone who has studied and obtained this level in the arts would in fact have mastered that style. I may be wrong, but at that level, I consider them having mastered that style they have studied. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
torris Posted August 19, 2004 Share Posted August 19, 2004 ...the belts do serve a purpose and that is to let the instructor know what 'level' you are at. that is what i think the belts are for. they are not for you as a reward or reference of some sort. they are to help the instructor know how/what/when he should be teaching you. That makes complete sense. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Drunken Monkey Posted August 19, 2004 Share Posted August 19, 2004 ...the point is, i think 'master' does not exist. there are people who can tech you and people who can't. there are people who you can learn from and people who you can't. that is it. the title isn't used in any culture when talking about martial arts except in ENGLISH where it is a bad translation of 'teacher' 'martial father' 'head of school' 'door keeper' 'keeper of the dojo' 'keeper of the quan' and too many other titles. NONE of which means master. the 5th dans and above well, you can call them master (which you've already shown to be your opinion that they are) but i think the good ol' regular title of 'teacher' is still more fitting. i know i'm probably picking at your choice of words and not paying attention to your intention but i hope you understand what i'm trying to get at. master means nothing. in chinese it only means 'guy in charge of....' i don't think peole should be focusing on how good they might get or how good they want to get and worry about how good (or not) they are now. too many people think about how in x amount of years time they will be this or that and don't think today or tomorrow which is what matter's most. which is again part of where belts don't help. they remove the focus from the individual onto an inanimate object that has nothing to do with actual skill. post count is directly related to how much free time you have, not how intelligent you are."When you have to kill a man it costs nothing to be polite." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sAtelitte Posted August 19, 2004 Share Posted August 19, 2004 Basicly i have no problem with the belt system even though there's not supposed to be one in shaolin kung fu. I chose the third option because i have no idea how many belts there are in our system (as far as i know its: no belt => white belt => yellow belt =>orange belt => ???? => black belt) There is only one orange belt training, couple of yellow's and then about 10 white's and 10 with no belt. No-one even thinks about getting a black belt after seeing how good the yellows and the orange are, i would be happy if i ever get to yellow so there's no real purpose of a bb cause it's as good as unreachable. too many people think about how in x amount of years time they will be this or that and don't think today or tomorrow which is what matter's most. That's true but i think most of those people need to set a goal for them or they would simply give up. https://www.shaolin.be Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kamiya Posted August 20, 2004 Share Posted August 20, 2004 I agree with others who have said the belt system is a good thing, as long as you are made to earn your belt. I think belt testings should be very strictly enforced. If nothing else, I think it's important for the students in the dojo to be able to discern among their peers who is more advanced in the art. That way they can show proper respect to someone more skilled. ~Erin9th Kyu"Don't hit at all if it is honorably possible to avoid hitting; but never hit soft."~ Theodore Roosevelt Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
karatekid1975 Posted August 20, 2004 Share Posted August 20, 2004 I agree. I'd keep it. But like kamiya said, I'd strictly enforce the ranks. I'd also drop a few ranks. 4 or 5 is plenty. Laurie F Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Red J Posted August 20, 2004 Share Posted August 20, 2004 My first style had white, green, brown and black. Each colored level had one stripe. My current system has white, yellow, orange, purple, blue, green, brown, and black. There are stripes at blue, green and brown. I think that 4-6 colored levels is ideal. One mcdojo that I visited had 22 belts for their kids program. I thought that was extreme, but I guess that they must of tested every other week as there were several 12 year black belts (don't get me going on this). When the instructor talked to me he imediately went into his "pitch". I felt like he was trying to sell me an extended warranty for a car. He wouldn't let up and I finally just walked out. I had to lose my mind to come to my senses. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Drunken Monkey Posted August 21, 2004 Share Posted August 21, 2004 on a not too un-related topic. there is a wing chun association out there that has a habit of introducing a new 'grade' (no belts) every few years. it works out that to get to an instructor level would take, if you're lucky, 20 odd years. then tehre are levels beyond instructor. now i should say this is partly from word of mouth but i'm looking into it.... belt-no belt. it doesn't matter. it's a question of power. they have the power to do something (give a belt, grade, badge, what-ever). what you have to try and do is limit the way in which they can abuse that, which, at the end of the day, is down to how honest they are. post count is directly related to how much free time you have, not how intelligent you are."When you have to kill a man it costs nothing to be polite." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Karategurl Posted August 21, 2004 Share Posted August 21, 2004 I like the belt system we have, but it feels like it takes forever to get from one rank to another. The teaching ranks always confuses me. My dojo goes by> white,purple,yellow,orange,blue,green,brown, and finally black.< I just wish we could cut it down just a tad. Hurt rather than injure,Injure rather than maim,Maim rather than kill,kill rather than be killed... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now