Jump to content
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt

Recommended Posts

  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • Replies 45
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

one came from okinawa, one came from china. kung fu is a term for a ton of chinese things, very broad spectrum (mostly useless i say, but what do i know), while karate is not as diverse- if you can put it that way. what else? in general, kung fu could be described as more circular while karate is more linear. kung fu has a lot of animal mimicing stuff while karate is more punch kick etc.... i dunno, these are all generalizations really, but its kind of the idea... i guess.

"If an injury has to be done to a man it should be so severe that his vengeance need not be feared."

-Machiavelli

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Traditional Okinawan karate is highly circular. More modern sport derivatives or Japanese styles are much more linear. In effect, Okinawan styles developed from China and Japanese styles developed (in just the last 100 years, many of them much less) from Okinawa.

 

Okinawan styles feature much more natural stances while Japanese styles feature deeper and rigid positions.

 

In other words, Okinawan (traditional) are closer to their Chinese roots. In some cases, some of these styles are softer than quite a few Chinese systems. All the same, they can be considered a mixture of internal and external concepts.

 

China's schools are divided into two: External and Internal.

 

The external is "harder" and relies upon a lot of physical training (although some of these styles incorporate less of this). This group composes nearly all of what people think when they hear the word kung fu, as most styles are External. It attempts to use several attacks rather than one attack to dispatch an opponent. It also is heavy into strategy and tactics constructed around this philosophy to include the ability to give and receive blows.

 

There are only three true "Internal" styles: Bagua (Pa-kua), Xingyi (Hsing-I) and Taiji (Tai Chi). These are the soft styles, rely more upon internal strength and attempt to defeat the enemy with very few attacks or even one attack. Not that it is any lighter on strategy or theory, but the theory centers upon defeating the enemy with taking any blows yourself.

 

These are all broad generalizations for a very broad question...

Martial Arts Blog:http://bujutsublogger.blogspot.com/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

haha, good point.

karateka of Kobayashi Shorin-ryu karate-do(since 2000)

"A human life is truly as frail and fleeting as the morning dew." -Rashomon

“Like everyone else, you want to learn the way to win, but never to accept the way to lose. To accept defeat, to learn to die is to be liberated from it. So when tomorrow comes you must free your ambitious mind and learn the art of dying.” BL

Link to comment
Share on other sites

hahahaha! pasta and noodles... thats the perfect analogy. good job.

"If an injury has to be done to a man it should be so severe that his vengeance need not be feared."

-Machiavelli

Link to comment
Share on other sites

DD,

 

I believe that karate and kung fu are very differente in general, and I say in general because the question is very general. As Shorin Ryuu mentioned before, the okinawan karate styles share a lot of similarities with kung fu. But again one can right a book on the differences in general.

 

Just some examples: generally kung fu styles have more variety of punching/hand techniques than their karate counter parts. Again generally, the breathing techniques when blows are delivered can differ vastly between the chinese and their okinawan/ japanese counterparts where the kung fu breathing uses a more relaxed exhalation and is less noisy than the karate kiai,etc. . Even in the external styles of kung fu many techniques will have a "relaxed" feel about them in comparison with most karate styles, where the onlooker will not fully appreciate the intesity of the blows - unless they actually hit him. Even the so called external schools of kung fu place a great amount of emphasis on internal training. It is important to point out that one of the main differences between the "internal" and "external" schools is not wether internal energy is used in the techniques or not, but rather in the WAY that this energy is utilized in the blows.

 

I would like to stress again that as the question is general so is my answer and there will be exeptions to the differences I have listed above.

 

Wing Chun Kuen Man

Real traditional martial arts training is difficult to find.....most dojos in the west are Mcdojos....some are better and some are worst....but they are what they are....do you train in one?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...