Sho-ju Posted December 2, 2003 Posted December 2, 2003 The quarterstaff was closely identified with sport and civilian self-defence, as a weapon of expedience used by travellers or in formal duels. By the early 1700s the weapon was commonly employed in public prize-fights, with the winner receiving both gate-money and the proceeds of wagering. http://www.alliancemartialarts.com/quarterstaff.htm Combat Manuals http://www.duchy.dyndns.info/yeomen/manuals.html How well do you think the quarter staff stands up to the Okinawan bo? Have you ever done the quarterstaff?
Shorinryu Sensei Posted December 9, 2003 Posted December 9, 2003 The staff, by whatever name you wnt to call it, has been in nearly every culture, and is by far the most common weapon. As to whether the quarterstaff or the bo is better? I don't know. I would suspect that they are quite similar, although the quarterstaff appears to have been longer. I don't know about the hardness of English hardwoods, but I know Okinawan hardwoods are darn near unbreakable! My nightly prayer..."Please, just let me win that PowerBall Jackpot just once. I'll prove to you that it won't change me!"
Rich_2k3 Posted January 11, 2004 Posted January 11, 2004 English oak, very strong. "When my enemy contracts I expand and when he expands I contract" - Bruce Lee
Hoju Posted January 11, 2004 Posted January 11, 2004 Ah, but so is Chinese Wood, as Shortround informed us in Indiana Jones & the Temple of Doom. Sorry, couldn't resist.
Drunken Monkey Posted January 12, 2004 Posted January 12, 2004 sometimes i like to forgo the word 'staff' and go back to good old 'big fat stick'... sorry. back to the quality of various woods. the one thing i know about some chinese woods is that they are naturally very oily and as such can survive in more varied conditions. hence the preference to use teak for wooden dummys that are often left in the open. post count is directly related to how much free time you have, not how intelligent you are."When you have to kill a man it costs nothing to be polite."
JerryLove Posted January 12, 2004 Posted January 12, 2004 Hrm. I will need to do some reasearch, but I suspect that "quaterstaf" was a method of staff-fighting, not a type of staff... Similarly, there should be a "half-staff" method, just as there is a "half-sword" method. https://www.clearsilat.com
Recommended Posts