Montana

Check out these videos of OSensei Soken Hohan. He was in his 80's at this time. https://www.google.com/search?q=hohan+soken&hl=en&rlz=1T4ADRA_enUS433US448&prmd=imvnso&source=univ&tbm=vid&tbo=u&sa=X&ei=YHJ8T82IKaemiQLu8J3xDQ&ved=0CFQQqwQ

Sorry...TRIPLE POST! ARGH!!! Darn internet connection!

Sorry...double post

54? Oh heck, you're just a kid and reaching your prime in the arts! Go for it bud!

FYI...a bo is generally about 6' long while a jo is about 4' long.

I tried to watched the vids, but I have a crummy cell phone "hot spot" internet which works perfecly on my wifes laptop, but stops very frequently on my desktop. I couldn't see past the first 15 seconds or so of the first vid, but did see about half of the 2nd. On the 2nd vid, although there were a lot of slow motion movements with the legs (very impressive balance andstrength), the other hand and leg techniques were fast, crisp and had power behind them, which is what I was talking about not seeing in your video. You don't have to be (as in the 2nd vid) a 4-6th dan black belt to achieve that power and speed, you just need to practice it over and over again. I have seen countless mid-level colored belts attain that speed and power, and certainly at the black belt level it is expected (IMO of course) as a matter of course.

Well, since you asked... As I've stated on this form before, I've been a kata judge and kumite ref of open, all-style tournamentssince 1979 or so and have seen hundreds of competitors doing all sorts of kata. Karate, TKD, kungfu, freestyle, etc. I have never been to an ITF tournament before, so I don't know what is considered "good" kata. So take what I say with a grain of salt. In my experience with judging all styles of kata, ESPECIALLY AT THE BLACK BELT LEVEL, I would give your performance a very low score. Why? Well, as I stated, at the black belt level I would expect to see good speed and power behing each and every block, punch and kick. There was none in your kata. You went thru the motions, which I'm sure were correct for the kata, but there was no attempt at putting any power behind any of the techniques. I suppose this is why we rarely see any ITF competitors at our tournaments, although they are always invited...as are ANYONE that wants to compete.

Agreed. 6 classes is a drop of water in the lake. Personally, doibng kata and NOT teaching bunkai makes doing kata just a bunch of motions with no meaning. You have to know bunkai to make the kata come alive!

I've fought (for real) 3 people at the same time. DEFINITELY stacking is the best way. That video is an excellent example of a man with skills VS other men without skills (apparently). He kept moving, which is key. Standing in one spot gives your opponents time to manuever around you and attack from behind, which can be lethal! Another thing is to use your environment environment to your advantage. If you hare between parked cars that limits the attack angles an opponent can come at you. Another thing are telephone poles or such. Put them between you and an opponent if possible. Taking an opponent to the ground and tryibng to get a submission in a multiple attacker scenerio is STUPID! Shile you're tied up with obne opponent makibng him say "Uncle", the others will kick your brains in. Stay on your feet and keep moving, as the video showed. Deal hard, solid and disabling blows to any available target and attempt to put them down as quickly as possible.

I did the same thing a number of years ago. Invited Parker Kenpo, TKD, shotokan and a kungfu studio. Only people that showed were about a dozen Kenpo guys/gals. It was a BLAST! l talked to the TKD instructor a few weeks later and asked why he didn't come. His response, and I quote, was "We didn't want to come and dominate the event and embarass you." HA! I REALLY wish he would have come, as did the Kenpo instructor.

Point sparring is a game of tag. You have to get your "point" before the other guy does. If the other guy just keeps backing up as you press him, back him into a corner. Learn to use feints (example: fake a kick, lunge with a back fist) but mix it up because people learn real quick what you're doing. Bummer groin kicks aren't allowed..they are so much fun against kickers, especially head hunters. Just do it once and that takes away a lot of what they want to do. The one tournament I actually competed in wat against a 3rd dan BB in TKD. I could tell that he wanted to kick me in the head in a real bad way, so after we broke for a point call I got into a very low stance and presented him mty head on a silver platter. He moved forward and started ti side kick to my head. I dropped to the floor on my side and launced a side kick perfectly to his groin. Boy, was he...uhhhh...MAD! he pretty much lost control at that poibnt because he knew I had suckered him. He never threw a kick the rest of the match, which I won.

I've been a judge and ref since about 1979 or so at this type of tournament. If groin kicks are allowed, forget tghe TKD kicks. You'll face someone that loves TKD people (like me) to spar against because they fake pretty easy for ghand techniques, and when they try to do any sort of high kick, I neuter them. Figuratively of course. Anyway, what I saw ibn yoru video is that you are VERY one dimensional. You use a right side kick nearly exclusively, which as a white or yellow belt is ok, but at the brown belt level you have to mix it up a whole lot more. You ALWAYS went straight at the guy and you nearly always attacked instead of counter attacked (I'm a specialist in coubnter attacking). You also need to work on yoru speed. MUCH to slow for that belt level. Pick it up and use your hands more, less of the right side kick.

Well, I've been doing Shorin Ryu since 1/1975 and here is my workout routine. Go to class. Train hard. Practice your kata and basics outside of class every chance you get. *repeat* So far, it's worked great for me. When I get a student that tells me their primary purpose for learning karate is to get into better shape I tell them to uit and join a gym. "I'm here to teach you karate, not to build better bodies."

I've been judging/ref'ing tournaments since about 1980 or so and I don't know of one single judge, out of the hundreds of judges I've met and worked with, that would take offense at being asked for advice on how to improve your kata in their eyes. Just be courteous, open minded and polite. When a competitor asks me for advice after an event, I look at it as an opportunity, just like in my own class, to help someone improve. Of course, each judge will have their own opinions, such as lower stances, higher kicks (none of which I would recommend personally), etc so you need to take each comment with a grain of salt. Use what is useful to you, toss the rest.

Thanks, Wastelander. I've judged in TKD tournaments for the most part. Yeah, we have high kickers, but the height of the kick is not the only factor in judging a kick; chamber position, lockout, speed and power, rechamber, hand position throughout the kick, pivot foot, target, etc all come into play.Stances should be balanced, and one should move easily from stance to stance. If a front stance is so deep that one foot must shift in order to move the other, then the stance is no good. Stances should also facilitate the power of techniques. Blocking and striking techniques should generate power from the hips, through the stances, and should be crisp, clean, and focused. That's my take, anyways. Whereas I've only judged open, all-style tournaments involving Japanese, Okinawan, Korean, Phillipino, American, Kungfu and essentially...ANY system that was competing against each other, so we had a broad range of hard or soft kata in the same division competing against each other. You have to have an open mind and look at the core elements of the kata, not the"Oh no, he didn't have a low stance so I'll mark him lower" mentality, because not all systems (mine included) use low stances. I don't like or condone high kicks at all, but in a kata competition I have to forget that and judge the TKD competitor on the same criteria I use for the softer Kungfu competitors kata.

I agree that from one tournament to another it's a matter of what the judge sees, but I don't agree that doing lower stances, slow techniques or excessive kai's makes any difference. As a judge I look for speed, power, control, accuracy and just plain good, solid technique. Do a back flip or split and I will drop your score down at least a full point. Kai every technique and that will drop you more. Weak kicks/punches or blocks and down it will go further. Weak stances will also drop my scoring, but just because you make a wider, lower stance will not raise the score with me. Say for example you do Pinan Yondan. Maybe it doesn't look the same as MY Pinan Yondan, and that's ok. I won't mark you down for it one bit because I know systems vary. A kata doesn't have to be done the same as I do it to be great, it just needs to be done well

Check out this thread that I had a while back about what judges look for. http://www.karateforums.com/from-a-tournament-judge-and-referee-s-perspective-vt39692.html?sid=e11bfc1bb5f51986e0c5b7772343a762 Without being able to look at your kata I have no way of giving you any real advice on making you kata better. Judges are all different andlook for different things. It's entirely possible that the kata just see the other peoples kata as better than yours. In my experience, judges are people just like you. After a competition ask the judges if they could give you some advice on your kata. They are the ones that gave the scores and they are the ones that can best help you out.

I explain that shodan is "mastery" of the basics and basic concepts of the system. Nidan thru Rokudan (2nd - 6th) are consistent practrice and improvement thru training. Anything above rokudan are honorary degrees bestowed thru time and diligent, continued practice and improvement in the arts.

Here I'll disagree with you. I'm an old traditionalist and view the arts as they were intended...and that is for self-defense purposes, not sport. Health...absolutely! Sport...never as a primary emphasis. If, in conjunction with your self-defense training, you want to add the sport aspect, that's ok in my opinion, but only as an added side product of your training, not as a primary aspect. My $.02 worth...

Define LARP please.

1. throughout your karate "career", did you ever fail a Dan exam? NO 2. did you ever fail a kyu exam? NO 3. do you know somebody who did? YES And for instructors: 4. what is your pass/fail rate when you are giving exams? For colored belts and black belts? [/b]My pass/fail rate is real close to 100% passing. I don't test until I know they are ready, and generally I don't tell the student they are being tested, other than they know they are being tested in each and every class.

AGREED! That's like saying the nunchauku are just two small pieces of wood, when they are so much more if you know what to do with them.

Yeah...short and sweat...to the point. But, your testing was actually 2 weeks long, if I understand what I've highlighted in the bold above. I hadn't really thought of it that way bwefore...but you may be right! Regardless, any test I've taken since then was short and to the point. No papers, no speeches, no handstand pushups, etc. Just do this or that as requested...passed!

I never had any luck with flyers, posters, radio/tv ads, newspaper ads, etc. The best advertisement is your students and what they say about your class and you.