mmafighter34

general surrounding exactly meaning your neighborhood and enviroment.which your parents provide the media is not responsible for kids bad behavior it probally the last element to add to the mix if parenting were better and parents actually were closer with there kids. The type music they like would be irrelavant as to how it effects there behavior and its irrelevant factor to begin with.Parents are just blaming the entertainment industry because its an easy target. Parents these days dont want to be held for their childrens behavio. I MEAN YOU WOULD KNOW THAT if you watched some of these talk shows today. my psyche teachers says be tween the ages of 2-12 you should spend on average of 5.7hours a day with your child to develop a mental healthy person. The average american parent barely gets in 3. you do the math

exactly already criminal minded people so if you were a god persn prior to listening to rap music then you will still be a good person afterwards.so stop blaming the entertainment i ndustry and blame the real problem bad parenting. see people always seem to take focus off the real problem and on to something else.'ahh my son shot some one its 50 cents fault' no you dumb parent you just werent watching your kid.[/b]

gangsta rap making to days youth violent as a psychologist student i'm offeneded by that comment. to be agressive one has to make that ransition you just arent in church one day prayig to god and a gangsta rap record comes on and you go out and kill someone. you have to make that choice yourself then use the music to put you in the mood. you talk about violent entertainment and influence while the star of the terminator is the govenor of california. 2nd eminem got famous by talking about killing and raping his mom on record and how he was going to kill homosexuals. i like all rap commercial and underground. rap and violent enertainment is not the problem with todays youth its bad parenting. white conservative people just blame the entertainment industry because they dont want to spend the time to properly raise there kids because it will intefere with there long buissness hours. i am white by the way so it is not a racial thing.[/b]

in real life i would get in a angle position and block all punches from one angle then using a leftjaband right hook combonation knock the firsst 100 out then i would restet into another angle and do a 100 roundhouses and i would be done i would have like 1/100000 chances of wining but hey goona try.

wrestling is good especially if you want to restrain the person as far as multiple attackers go i would nt count on it it depends on the situation.btw i am a big professional wrestling fan alot of those guys are great athletes some are not. wwe's rob van dam use to be a kick boxer ken shamrock of course ufc competitor goldberg,rock,austin kevin nash and big show,are all former ncaa and nfl players kurt angle is an olympic champion in free style wrestling brock lensar was a ncaa ameature wrestling champion.

HI,I'm new and ive studied martial arts for awhile. i'm preparing to return to my training after a 3 yr break, but i'm loking for the best style for me. I KNOW I WANT SOMETHING EFFECTIVE IN SELF DEFENSE GETS ME IN GREAT SHAPE AND THE BASICS ARE EASY TO LEARN.The most important thing is that it is effective in self defense.Now ive ben doing reasearch on styles for sd on MA sites/forums. I notice that people argue that some arts are not effective. I think when people think of effective they start to think of MA MOVIES EVEN THOUGH THEY KNOW THERE NOT REAL. Martial arts was not meant for you to beable to beat the hell out of 7 guys more athlectic then u tko on them with no effort then moon walk out of the room. Now an effective martial art is an art that the basics are easy to learn,can be affective with the least amount of athecticism(strenght,speed,agility,quickness),and the common person can use. I think people go towards japnese/chinese arts like okinawankarate/shaolinkungfu because it is more suited for common non-athlectic people and is still very effective,rather koreas tkd or thailands MT because which is more for athlethes. Now the more athlecticism you have the more arts are suited for you. I have mediocre athlecicism so I am now in a process of choosing between shaolin kungfu ,kravmaga muay thai(I HAVE ENOUGH ATHLECTICISM TO PULL THIS OFF I THINK)and some forms of karate if i could find a style of karate that involved joint locks and throws in its basic curriculum. I am seriously considering cross training. Styles become more effective when you cross train them. EXAMPLE(TKD=OK/ TKD + JUDO= PRETTY EFFECTIVE TKD+HAPKIDO=VERY EFFECTIVE /TKD+HPK+WESTERN BOXING=HIGHLY EFFECTIVE/ TKD+HPK+ JKD=SUPER EFFECTIVE). This could become confusing as far as fighting applications to the diffrent styles for beginners but luckily I'm not new to the MA world and I HAVE OVER 300 MARTIAL ARTS SCHOOLS AT MY DIS POSAL BECAUSE I LIVE IN A HUGE CITYOF CHICAGO. Tell me your opinion oh yeh great forums very in formative. jeet kune do is an option as well for me. ive studied tae kwondo and aikido and kenpo karate in the past. [/b]