Seems like another typical Grappling Vs Striking thread. Most of the arguments have already been covered from both sides, but I would like to say that strikers don't know/understand the grappling range which makes them suspectible to take downs. Any grappling dojo worth their salt would have one person glove up while another practices their takedowns. Strikers realise how hard it is to keep the distance, grapplers learn their range where they can enter into the takedown. IMO, a striker who knows and understands the grappling range, particularly where they enter for the takedown is a dangerous fighter. Why argue over which is better? If a striker and a grappler clinch, it'll probably go to the ground with the grappler coming out on top, otherwise the grappler will most likely get KOed. They both complement each other nicely. Stop burying your head in the sand of ignorance and go train both.