ilansru

Here are some sites i found with pictures of techniques from various styles of kali. Some prefer long range and some close http://stickgrappler.tripod.com/fma/fma.html http://martialarts.about.com/gi/dynamic/offsite.htm?site=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.islandnet.com%2F%7Egmzimmer%2Fhistprin.htm http://martialarts.about.com/gi/dynamic/offsite.htm?site=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.eskrima.nl%2Findex01.htm -(this is my particular style) http://martialarts.about.com/gi/dynamic/offsite.htm?site=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.home-cov.demon.co.uk%2Fempesk2.htm http://martialarts.about.com/gi/dynamic/offsite.htm?site=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.islandnet.com%2F%7Egmzimmer%2Felements.htm http://martialarts.about.com/gi/dynamic/offsite.htm?site=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.arnis.org%2Farnissample.htm http://martialarts.about.com/gi/dynamic/offsite.htm?site=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.daimi.aau.dk%2F%7Ejpsdiry%2Farnis%2Fdescriptions.html http://martialarts.about.com/gi/dynamic/offsite.htm?site=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ummah.net%2Ffighting%2Ftut.htm --(this one has downloadable movies) enjoy by the way, is anybody interested in posting a forum of uknown marital arts, or the less common ones and seeing what people have to say about those? Let me know Thanks

filipino martial arts is my style (doece pares: inlcudes, pangamot, dumog, eskrido, eskrima, arnis, sikaram) Pros: you become effective quickly. 50% weapon training, 50% empty hand, involves all ranges of fighting, long medium close ground and transitions between them which is very improtant. hard/soft style. weapons fighting directly influences empty hand, based on quick entrances cons: overwhelming at first. not a popular style (hard to find). not enough focus on fighting on the ground. Does not focus on the internal aspect very much. Not very much long range fighting, most counters or entrances. Once again the biggest weakness in he style is that it is that ou need to be self motivated. Self training is one of the msot improtant aspects of the style